Insights
June 21, 2025
How much TV viewing is cable vs streaming? (Q1 2025)
Table of Contents
-
45%
Streaming's share of total TV viewing (May 2025)
-
24%
Cable TV's share of total viewing (down from 34% in 2020)
-
71%
Streaming viewing growth since 2021
Streaming now accounts for approximately 45% of total U.S. TV viewing time, while cable represents about 22% and broadcast television about 20%, according to Nielsen's Gauge reports for 2025. In a historic milestone reached in May 2025, streaming viewership (44.8%) exceeded the combined total of broadcast (20.1%) and cable (24.1%) television for the first time, according to Nielsen. This represents a fundamental shift in how Americans consume television content and has profound implications for advertisers.
The balance of power in television has shifted decisively. What began as a niche alternative to cable has become the dominant form of television viewing in American households. For businesses planning their advertising strategies, understanding this shift is essential. Cable advertising, once the default for local and regional advertisers, now reaches a shrinking audience, while streaming offers growing reach and increasingly accessible advertising options.
This transformation creates unprecedented opportunities for businesses of all sizes. Where cable advertising required substantial budgets and long-term commitments, connected TV advertising through streaming platforms allows businesses to start campaigns with budgets as low as $50, reaching audiences on the platforms where they actually spend their viewing time.
What the data shows
The viewing share numbers tell a clear story of streaming's ascendance and traditional TV's decline.
Current viewing share breakdown (2025)
Based on Nielsen's Gauge data and industry reporting:
Streaming: 44-47% of total TV viewing
Hit record 44.8% in May 2025
July 2025 saw continued growth
Includes Netflix, YouTube, Hulu, Prime Video, Disney+, and dozens more
Growing share month over month
Cable: 22-24% of total TV viewing
Down from highs of 30%+ just a few years ago
Continues steady decline
Sports and news remain strongest categories
Aging audience demographic
Broadcast: 20-21% of total TV viewing
Relatively stable compared to cable
Live events, news, and network series
NFL and major events drive spikes
Generally older audience
Other (DVD, gaming, etc.): 8-10%
Includes gaming console use
DVD/Blu-ray playback
Other connected device usage
The historic May 2025 milestone
According to StreamTV Insider's analysis, May 2025 marked a watershed moment:
Streaming: 44.8% of all TV viewing
Cable + Broadcast combined: 44.2%
First time streaming exceeded traditional TV combined
Netflix streaming hours reached 7.5% alone
YouTube maintained top streaming position at 12%+
This wasn't a temporary spike. The underlying trend has been clear for years, and this milestone represents streaming's permanent position as the dominant form of television viewing.
Year-over-year trends
The shift toward streaming has accelerated:
Streaming share growth:
2021: ~27% of TV viewing
2022: ~34% of TV viewing
2023: ~38% of TV viewing
2024: ~41% of TV viewing
2025: ~45%+ of TV viewing
Cable share decline:
2021: ~35% of TV viewing
2022: ~31% of TV viewing
2023: ~27% of TV viewing
2024: ~24% of TV viewing
2025: ~22% of TV viewing
Streaming has gained approximately 18 percentage points of share since 2021, while cable has lost roughly 13 percentage points. Broadcast has declined more gradually, losing 5-7 percentage points over the same period.
Platform-level viewing shares
Within streaming, viewership is distributed across multiple platforms:
Top streaming platforms by TV viewing share:
YouTube: 12-13% of total TV viewing
Netflix: 7-8% of total TV viewing
Hulu: 2-3% of total TV viewing
Amazon Prime Video: 3-4% of total TV viewing
Disney+: 1-2% of total TV viewing
Peacock: 1-2% of total TV viewing
Max (HBO): 1-2% of total TV viewing
Other streaming: 15%+ combined
YouTube's dominance is notable. The platform alone commands more viewing share than many cable networks combined, making it a critical advertising platform.
Breaking down the numbers
Understanding who watches what helps advertisers make informed decisions about where to invest.
Demographics of cable vs. streaming viewers
Cable viewers tend to be:
Older (median age 55+)
Higher income (legacy subscribers)
More likely to watch news and sports
More likely to live in suburban/rural areas
Often maintaining service for specific channels (ESPN, local news)
Streaming viewers tend to be:
Younger (median age 35-40)
All income levels (but higher adoption among higher incomes)
More likely to watch entertainment content
Urban and suburban concentrations
More tech-savvy, cord-cutters or cord-nevers
Broadcast viewers:
Oldest demographic (median age 60+)
Concentrated around major events (Super Bowl, Oscars, news)
Strong local news viewership
Over-the-air antenna users growing
These demographic differences have significant implications for advertisers. If your target customer is under 50, streaming is increasingly where you'll find them.
Viewing patterns by time of day
Morning (6 AM - 12 PM)
Broadcast leads with morning news shows
Cable news draws substantial audiences
Streaming lower but growing (background viewing)
Daytime (12 PM - 5 PM)
Streaming competitive with cable
Cable maintains daytime programming audience
Broadcast lowest during midday
Early evening (5 PM - 8 PM)
Local and national news boost broadcast/cable
Streaming begins prime-time surge
Family viewing decisions favor streaming
Prime time (8 PM - 11 PM)
Streaming dominates decisively
Cable and broadcast split remaining
Highest total viewing hours
Late night (11 PM - 2 AM)
Streaming very strong
Late-night shows split cable/broadcast
Younger audiences heavily streaming
For advertisers, streaming's prime-time dominance is particularly significant because this is when the most viewers are watching and when advertising delivers the greatest impact.
Seasonal variations
Viewing share fluctuates seasonally:
Summer months:
Streaming share typically highest
Cable/broadcast drop without regular programming
July 2025 saw streaming reach new highs
Fall (September-November):
Broadcast and cable recover with new seasons
NFL drives significant broadcast viewing
Streaming maintains strong position
Winter holidays:
Mixed viewing patterns
Special programming boosts traditional TV
Streaming grows with gift subscriptions
Q1 (January-March):
Super Bowl spike for broadcast
Otherwise streaming-favorable
March Madness boosts cable/broadcast temporarily
Geographic variations
Streaming adoption varies by region:
Urban areas: Highest streaming share (50%+)
Suburban areas: Near national average
Rural areas: Lower streaming share due to broadband limitations
Coastal markets: Higher streaming adoption
Midwest/South: More cable retention
For local TV advertising, geographic targeting through streaming allows advertisers to reach specific markets regardless of these regional variations.
Why it matters for your business
The shift from cable to streaming has direct implications for advertising strategy and budget allocation.
The advertising inventory shift
As viewership shifts, advertising inventory follows:
Cable advertising challenges:
Declining audience size
Older demographic skew
Scattered across hundreds of channels
Minimum commitments often $5,000+
Long lead times for placement
Streaming advertising advantages:
Growing audience size
Younger demographic access
Better targeting capabilities
Lower minimum budgets ($50 on some platforms)
Real-time optimization
For small business TV advertising, the streaming shift means more opportunity, not less. The same premium TV advertising that was once reserved for major brands is now accessible through platforms like Adwave.
Reaching different audiences
The cable vs. streaming split affects how you reach different customer segments:
To reach older consumers (55+):
Cable news (CNN, Fox News, MSNBC) still relevant
Broadcast network programming
But even this demographic is shifting to streaming
To reach middle-aged consumers (35-54):
Balanced approach needed
Streaming increasingly dominant
Some cable sports and news viewing
To reach younger consumers (18-34):
Streaming is essential
Cable reach is minimal
YouTube particularly strong
To reach families with children:
Streaming dominates (Disney+, YouTube, Netflix)
Limited cable consumption
Broadcast for special events only
Cost efficiency comparison
The economics of cable vs. streaming advertising differ significantly:
Cable advertising:
CPM: $5-15 (lower CPMs reflect smaller, older audiences)
Minimums: Often $2,000-5,000 per month
Production: Separate cost, $5,000-50,000
Targeting: Limited to DMA and daypart
Measurement: Nielsen estimates, limited attribution
Streaming/CTV advertising:
CPM: $20-35 (premium inventory, better targeting)
Minimums: As low as $50 on some platforms
Production: Free with AI tools like Adwave
Targeting: ZIP code, demographics, interests, behaviors
Measurement: Precise impression counts, completion rates
While cable CPMs are technically lower, streaming often delivers better ROI due to targeting precision and audience quality. Paying $25 CPM to reach your exact target audience beats paying $10 CPM to reach a broader, less relevant audience.
How to take advantage of this trend
The cable-to-streaming shift creates specific opportunities for advertisers who adapt their strategies.
Strategy 1: Shift budget to streaming
If you're currently advertising on cable, consider reallocating budget to streaming:
Why shift:
Growing audience on streaming
Better targeting reduces waste
Lower barriers to entry
More flexible buying
How to shift:
Start with a streaming test campaign alongside cable
Compare performance metrics
Gradually increase streaming allocation
Reduce cable as streaming proves effective
Strategy 2: Use aggregated streaming platforms
Rather than buying individual streaming services, use platforms that aggregate inventory:
Benefits:
Single buy reaches multiple services
Simplified management and reporting
Access to inventory across the streaming ecosystem
Often better CPMs than direct buys
Adwave provides access to 100+ premium streaming channels, solving the fragmentation challenge with a single campaign.
Strategy 3: Target cord-cutters specifically
Many streaming viewers are cord-cutters or cord-nevers who cannot be reached through cable:
Cord-cutter advertising tactics:
Focus on streaming-only platforms
Target younger demographics
Emphasize digital-native messaging
Use streaming's geographic targeting
Strategy 4: Maintain some traditional TV for specific goals
Traditional TV still makes sense in specific situations:
When cable/broadcast makes sense:
Major local events (local news, sports)
Reaching older demographics specifically
Very large local budgets seeking maximum reach
Specific programming partnerships
When streaming is better:
Younger audiences
Precise geographic targeting
Flexible budgets
Measurable performance goals
Strategy 5: Integrate streaming with digital campaigns
Streaming TV works best as part of an integrated marketing approach:
Sequential messaging: Use streaming for awareness, digital for action
Retargeting: Follow up streaming viewers with digital ads
Consistent branding: Maintain creative consistency across channels
Measurement: Track lift across all channels
The bigger picture
The shift from cable to streaming represents the most significant transformation in television since the advent of cable itself.
The acceleration during 2020-2025
The pandemic accelerated streaming adoption dramatically:
2020: Stay-at-home orders drove streaming trial
2021: Habits formed during pandemic persisted
2022-2023: Streaming services added content, users stayed
2024: Ad-supported tiers launched widely
2025: Streaming crosses historic 45% threshold
What might have taken a decade occurred in five years. The transformation is essentially complete. Streaming is now the default form of television viewing for most Americans.
The future trajectory
Industry analysts project continued streaming growth:
2025-2026: Streaming likely to reach 50% share
Cable: Expected to continue decline to 15-18%
Broadcast: Stable at 18-22% (protected by sports, news)
Advertising shifts: CTV ad spending growing 15-20% annually
The question is no longer whether streaming will dominate but how advertisers will adapt to a streaming-first television landscape.
Implications for local advertising
For local businesses, the streaming shift is particularly significant:
Traditional local TV (cable/broadcast):
Historically the only TV option for local advertisers
Required substantial budgets
Limited targeting (DMA-level only)
Declining reach as viewers leave
Streaming local advertising:
Precise geographic targeting (ZIP code level)
Lower budget minimums
Growing reach as viewership increases
Better measurement and attribution
The combination of growing streaming viewership and accessible advertising platforms means local businesses can now execute effective TV advertising campaigns that would have been impossible just a few years ago.
What experts are saying
Industry analysts have noted the significance of the cable-to-streaming shift.
StreamTV Insider reported that "streaming accounted for 44.8% of all TV viewing in the US in May, according to Nielsen, narrowly surpassing for the first time the combined monthly usage of broadcast and cable television." The publication noted this milestone as a turning point in television history.
Hollywood Reporter's analysis observed that "the gains for streaming came largely at the expense of cable, which came in at 22.2 percent of TV use for the July reporting period." This highlights that cable, not broadcast, has borne the brunt of streaming's rise.
AmbioEdu's research confirmed that "streaming surpassed cable and broadcast in total viewing time in 2024 and continues to dominate in 2025. Over 40% of all TV time is now spent on streaming platforms."
The consensus view is that streaming's dominance is permanent and growing. Advertisers who fail to adapt risk reaching shrinking audiences at increasing cost while missing the growing majority of viewers.
Common questions answered
Is cable TV dying?
Cable isn't dying immediately, but it's in sustained decline. Viewership has dropped from 35%+ to about 22% of total TV viewing in just a few years, and the trend continues. Cable retains strength in sports and news, but even those advantages are eroding as streaming services acquire sports rights. For advertisers, cable still offers some reach, but declining audiences mean it should be supplemented with streaming.
When did streaming overtake cable?
Streaming first surpassed cable as the single largest category of TV viewing in July 2022, when streaming captured 34.8% versus cable's 34.4%. In May 2025, streaming (44.8%) exceeded the combined total of cable (24.1%) and broadcast (20.1%) for the first time. The trend has been consistent and accelerating.
Should I stop advertising on cable?
Not necessarily, but you should evaluate whether cable still reaches your target audience. If you're targeting viewers over 55, cable may still be relevant. For most businesses targeting younger or broader audiences, shifting budget toward streaming makes sense. Consider testing streaming alongside cable, measuring results, and adjusting allocation based on performance.
How does streaming advertising compare to cable advertising?
Streaming offers better targeting (ZIP code, demographic, behavioral), more flexible budgets (minimums as low as $50), and better measurement. Cable offers lower CPMs but less precise targeting and declining audience. For most small businesses, streaming's targeting advantages outweigh cable's lower CPMs because you're paying to reach only relevant audiences.
What percentage of TV viewing is streaming now?
As of 2025, streaming represents approximately 44-47% of total U.S. TV viewing, varying by month. This is the largest share of any category and continues to grow. Cable represents about 22% and broadcast about 20%, with the remainder split among other sources like gaming and DVD playback.
Can small businesses advertise effectively on streaming?
Yes, absolutely. Platforms like Adwave make streaming TV advertising accessible to businesses of all sizes with minimums as low as $50. AI-powered ad creation eliminates production costs. Geographic targeting ensures your budget reaches your specific market. Small businesses can now execute TV advertising campaigns that deliver real results without cable's traditional barriers.
How do I know if my target audience is on streaming or cable?
Consider your target customer's age and media habits. If your customers are under 50, streaming is increasingly where they spend their TV time. If you're targeting audiences over 55, cable may still be relevant. You can also use tools like Nielsen's audience data or simply ask your current customers about their viewing habits. For most businesses, a streaming-first approach makes sense given the trend direction.
What's happening to cable TV advertising rates?
Cable advertising CPMs have been declining as viewership drops, but not as quickly as viewership has fallen. This creates an efficiency problem: you're paying for access to a shrinking audience. Meanwhile, cable operators are raising rates for premium placements (sports, prime-time news) where viewership remains concentrated. For advertisers, this means cable's value proposition continues to deteriorate relative to streaming.
Are sports viewers still on cable?
Sports is cable's strongest remaining category, but even this is shifting. NFL games on broadcast and streaming (Amazon Prime Video, Netflix) are drawing significant audiences away from cable. Regional sports networks are losing subscribers. While dedicated sports fans still rely on cable for some content, the trend favors streaming. ESPN+, Peacock, and other streaming services are acquiring more sports rights, accelerating the shift.
How should I split my advertising budget between cable and streaming?
For most businesses, start with at least 50% of your TV budget on streaming, especially if you're targeting audiences under 55. Test both channels, measure results, and adjust based on performance. Many advertisers find that shifting more budget to streaming improves overall campaign efficiency. The right split depends on your specific audience, goals, and current results from each channel. Consider starting with streaming-only campaigns to establish a baseline, then add cable only if you identify specific audiences or programs that justify the additional spend.
What content categories are strongest on cable vs. streaming?
Cable retains strength in a few key content categories. Live news remains a cable stronghold, with CNN, Fox News, and MSNBC still drawing substantial audiences for breaking news and political coverage. Live sports, particularly regional sports networks and ESPN, continue to draw cable viewers, though this is eroding as streaming acquires more sports rights. Niche interest channels like HGTV, Food Network, and Discovery still maintain loyal cable audiences. In contrast, streaming dominates entertainment programming, scripted series, movies, reality content, and user-generated content. For advertisers, this means cable buys should be strategic and focused on these remaining cable-strong categories rather than broad placements.
Is the cable-to-streaming shift happening globally or just in the US?
The streaming shift is a global phenomenon, though the US is among the most advanced markets. Western Europe, Australia, Canada, and urban Asia are seeing similar patterns of streaming growth and cable decline. However, the US market is particularly notable for its fragmentation across so many streaming services and for the complete disruption of the traditional cable bundle. International markets often have different dynamics due to local broadcasters, language requirements, and varying levels of broadband infrastructure. For US-focused advertisers, the domestic trends are clear: streaming is where audiences are moving and where advertising budgets should follow.
How has the cable-to-streaming shift affected advertising inventory and pricing?
The shift has created interesting dynamics for both channels. Cable advertising inventory is declining as viewership drops, but rates haven't fallen proportionally, meaning cost-per-viewer is actually increasing on cable. Meanwhile, streaming inventory is growing rapidly as more services launch ad-supported tiers, creating supply that has helped moderate CTV CPMs. The net effect is that streaming increasingly offers better value: growing audiences, better targeting, and competitive pricing. For advertisers who haven't yet shifted budget to streaming, the economics increasingly favor making that move sooner rather than later.
Supporting data
Key statistics on cable vs. streaming viewing:
44-47%: Streaming share of total TV viewing (2025)
22-24%: Cable share of total TV viewing (2025)
20-21%: Broadcast share of total TV viewing (2025)
44.8%: Historic streaming share in May 2025
12-13%: YouTube's share of total TV viewing
7-8%: Netflix's share of total TV viewing
18 pts: Streaming share gain since 2021
13 pts: Cable share loss since 2021
$50: Minimum streaming ad budget on accessible platforms
100+: Streaming channels accessible via aggregated platforms
Data sources:
Get started with streaming TV advertising
The shift from cable to streaming isn't coming; it's already here. Your customers are increasingly watching streaming television, and that's where your advertising should be.
Adwave makes streaming TV advertising accessible for businesses of all sizes. Create a professional TV commercial in minutes with AI, target your specific market, and launch across 100+ premium streaming channels starting at just $50.